Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.


Specialisation for Developing Countries: Advantages and Disadvantages

By John Dudovskiy

specialisation Advantages of specialisation for Developing Countries

Increased Production. Developing countries with specialisation are able to gain efficiencies generated from economies of scale and increased output (Mankiw 2004)

 

 

Production Efficiency. The more efficient use of resources, the higher will be productivity of output of domestic goods and services. Furthermore, international competition leads to use of new technology and marketing methods (Parkin 2008).

 

Benefit to Customers. Parkin (2008) mentions that specialisation in producing limited range of products offer wide range of choice for customers around the world at lower prices as people have tremendous diversity in tastes for different products and they value variety.

 

Arguments against Free Trade and Specialisation.

However, Carbaugh (2004) argues that the key to success in free trade can be achieved only through mutually beneficial approach, which satisfies both the giver and taker. Though law of comparative advantage maintains that nations benefit equally from international trade, there might not be mutual benefits between strong and weak countries, as the strong countries tend to take more advantage of it (Mankiw  2004).

Many economists believe that current international markets are not level playing field and trade systems in practice favours developed countries and hinder development in the developing or less-developing nations (Carbaugh 2004). They also suggest that organisations such as IMF or WTO mainly work to fulfil interest of powerful countries (Parkin 2008).

Another fallacy about free trade is that imports reduce employment, while exports promote growth. Therefore, the notion that import are “bad” while exports are “good” particularly popular among politicians and media (Carbaugh 2004).

 

References 

Carbaugh (2004) “International Economics”, Ninth Edition, Thomson, New York

Mankiw (2004) “Principle of Macroeconomics”, South Western, USA

Parkin (2008) “Macroeconomics”, Pearson, USA



Category: Economics
[]