<\/a>Dell acknowledges the importance of being perceived as socially responsible and unlike many other companies of its size and the sphere of operations, the company maintains a positon of Vice President for Corporate Responsibility. Dell has been acknowledged as the most ethical company for 2014 and 2015 by Ethisphere Institute. The company developed The Legacy of Goods 2020 Plan and its annual CSR report is update on the achievement of this plan. The Legacy of Goods 2020 comprises 21 ambitious long-term goals.\u00a0 Dell releases Supplier Responsibility Progress Report annually and it includes the details of CSR programs and initiatives engaged by the company. Table 3 below illustrates highlights from the latest report for 2014: Categories of CSR activities DELL Performance Educating and empowering workers Dell has been included in the list of \u2018100 Best Companies To Work For\u2019 by Working Mother AwardThe level of employee satisfaction assessed within the scope of Tell Dell global survey reached 80% in FY2015. This is an increase of 2% compared to the previous year Dell gained more than 33 awards globally during FY2015 for being an employer of choice The volume of hiring from university by Dell amounted to 24% of all external hires during the FY2015 By the end of FY2015 about 25% of eligible employees entered Dell\u2019s flexible work programs Engagement in employee resource groups was increased from 14% in FY2014 to 18% in FY2015 In FY15, 86% of newly promoted people leaders enrolled Dell\u2019s Foundations of Leadership training program Environmenta) energy consumption b) water consumption c) recycling \u00a0 \u00a0 d) CO2 emissions Within the scope of its Plant a Tree program, Dell has planted 678,000 trees. An estimated 463,180 tons of carbon has been sequestered thanks to this programAccording to Dell, its products consume 30% less energy compared to industry average…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[54],"tags":[],"yst_prominent_words":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/research-methodology.net\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6870"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/research-methodology.net\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/research-methodology.net\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/research-methodology.net\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/research-methodology.net\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=6870"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/research-methodology.net\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6870\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/research-methodology.net\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6870"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/research-methodology.net\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=6870"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/research-methodology.net\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=6870"},{"taxonomy":"yst_prominent_words","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/research-methodology.net\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/yst_prominent_words?post=6870"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}